|
|
Post by vanguardian on Jul 31, 2010 9:54:45 GMT -6
So I've been pondering this a while...
What if you ran RDW with Time Reversal? There was a RDW in Japan that one a Nats qualifier (I think it was) by running all burn and Howling Mine. Could the same be done with Time Reversal? Even run Jace Beleren for cards? To make it even better, run a Runeflare Trap. lol, that idea just came to mind, but its funny. Let me draw up a draft:
4x Goblin Guide
3x Time Reversal
4x Searing Blaze
4x Lightning Bolt
4x Burst Lightning
4x Forked Bolt
2x Runeflare Trap
4x Scalding Tarn
4x Arid Mesa
4x Island
1x Halimar Depths
11x Mountain
Needs more burn! I forget that burn is getting the axe post-rotation. This is TBC. Or it could just be a Runeflare Trap deck (boring).
|
|
|
|
Post by vanguardian on Aug 4, 2010 14:09:15 GMT -6
I think Jace's Ingenuity may be good in this too.
|
|
|
|
Post by vanguardian on Aug 18, 2010 22:55:02 GMT -6
This deck must have been a terrible idea because this post killed Type 2 discussion, lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by th3on3songoku on Aug 19, 2010 10:05:43 GMT -6
no just the deck is a terrible idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by jhklauk on Aug 19, 2010 14:01:51 GMT -6
Let's not dismiss any decks until we have sleeved them up and played them.
Well unless they are running the card that shall not be named. Then we can dismiss them.
|
|
|
|
Post by vanguardian on Aug 19, 2010 14:07:03 GMT -6
Wait, what card shall not be named? I need a hint!
|
|
|
|
Post by natedog08 on Aug 19, 2010 15:56:43 GMT -6
Well, it's definately mythic. that should narrow down the list.
|
|
|
|
Post by th3on3songoku on Aug 19, 2010 22:29:47 GMT -6
ok the deck may not be terrible but time reversal is horrible in this deck. i dont mind a red/blue deck please for the love of mexicans take out time reversal.
|
|
|
|
Post by vanguardian on Aug 20, 2010 9:22:54 GMT -6
its a hand reloader. how is that terrible in red?
|
|
|
|
Post by vanguardian on Aug 20, 2010 9:23:31 GMT -6
Is the card with no name Jace?
|
|
|
|
Post by jhklauk on Aug 20, 2010 12:28:10 GMT -6
No. It is not Jace, but those two underlined letters are correct. Is Time Reversal "breakable" in this deck with Pyromancer's Ascension?
|
|
|
|
Post by natedog08 on Aug 20, 2010 13:18:27 GMT -6
IF the Ascension is already active, then i can see it being breakable. The only thing you'd have to be careful of is decks that have sideboardable removal for the Ascension. If they blow up your ascension in response to you casting Time Reversal, then that puts you pretty far behind since you won't have the instant/sorceries in the 'yard to get another ascension active early and easily.
|
|
|
|
Post by vanguardian on Aug 20, 2010 13:48:15 GMT -6
Lol, but Ascension + Runeflare Trap = Face Melt.
I think, Nathan, that Ascension is just a filler in the deck. It's like: if you get it active and it stays in play you can't lose, but if you don't you still have ways to win. It's not Pyromancer Ascension.dec; it's Burn.dec, with an Ascension alternative. In that sense, it may not be so bad as a 2 or 3 of main deck.
|
|
|
|
Post by natedog08 on Aug 20, 2010 14:32:30 GMT -6
I've never tested with the Ascension as filler, so, you'll have to let me know if it works.
|
|
|
|
Post by th3on3songoku on Aug 20, 2010 15:50:32 GMT -6
sure time reversal is a hand reloader but your also forgetting its reloads your opponents hand also. so any removal or counters or stuff to stop you, you just gave back to them do i think time reversal will see play yes after som when a combo with the deck happens right now i dont see it. there just better options.
|
|
